Unveiling Perspectives: The Utility and Limitations of Qualitative Research Methods in Understanding Human Experiences and Behaviors

Authors

  • Talitha Candrakirana Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Keywords:

Qualitative research methods, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, observations

Abstract

This paper examines the advantages and drawbacks of qualitative research techniques, specifically interviews and focus group discussions, in obtaining detailed insights and comprehending participants' external behaviors. This analysis utilizes two case studies—Simpson’s (2007) examination of emotional labor and gender identity in male caregivers and Akpabio et al.'s (2007) investigation of Nigerian students' perspectives on HIV/AIDS—to underscore how these methods provide valuable insights into participants’ beliefs and experiences. Nonetheless, the results indicate that qualitative interviews and focus group discussions by themselves may not completely encompass behavioral patterns, highlighting the necessity for observational methods to enhance them

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akpabio, I., Asuzu, M., Fajemilehin, B. and OFI, B. 2007. Utilisation of focus group discussion (FGD) as a research tool in community health nursing practice: A case study of the views and beliefs of secondary school students in Nigeria about HIV/AIDS and its prevention. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 9. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256387994_Utilisation_of_focus_group_discussion_FGD_as_a_research_tool_in_community_health_nursing_practice_A_case_study_of_the_views_and_beliefs_of_secondary_school_students_in_Nigeria_about_HIVAIDS_and_its_pr.

Alshenqeeti, H. 2014. Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review. English Linguistics Research 3(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39.

Arber A. (2006). Reflexivity: A challenge for the researcher as practitioner? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(2), 147–157.

Austin, Z. and Sutton, J. 2014. Qualitative Research: Getting Started. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 67(6). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406.

Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. &Tight, M. (2006). How to Research. (3rd Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Chhabra G. (2020). Insider, outsider or an in-betweener? Epistemological reflections of a legally blind researcher on conducting cross-national disability research. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22, 307–317.

TÜMEN AKYILDIZ, S. and AHMED, K.H. 2021. An Overview of Qualitative Research and Focus Group Discussion. International Journal of Academic Research in Education 7(1), pp. 1–15. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17985/ijare.866762.

Simpson, R. 2007. Emotional labour and identity work of men in caring roles. Gendering Emotions in Organizations , pp. 57–74. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07297-9_4.

Öhman, A. 2005. Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research1. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 37(5), pp. 273–280. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040056.

Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M. and de Lacey, S. 2016. Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction 31(3), pp. 498–501. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334.

Mwita, K. 2022. Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) 11(6), pp. 618–625. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920.

Steven Tenny, Brannan, J. and Grace Bannan 2022. Qualitative Study. StatPearls Publishing LLC . Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/#:~:text=Furthermore%2C%20with%20qualitative%20research%20researchers,with%20a%20goal%20or%20objective.

Hammersley, M. & Gomm, R. (2008). Assessing the radical critiques of interviews. In: M. Hammersley, (Ed.), Questioning Qualitative Inquiry: Critical Essays (pp. 89-100) London: Sage.

Morgan D.L., Spanish M.T.: Focus group: a new tool for qualitative research. Qual. Sociol. 7(3), 253–270 (1984)

Morrison D.E.: The Search for a Method. University of Luton Press, Luton (1998)

Marbach G.: Le ricerche di mercato. UTET, Torino (1982)

Greenbaum T.L.: The Handbook for Focus Group Research. D.C. Health and Company, Lexington (1988)

Merton R.K., Kendall P.L.: The focused interview. Am. J. Sociol. 51(6), 541–557 (1946)

Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London: Sage.

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J. B., Thorpe, S. &Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period.BMC Medical Research Methodology.18(48), 1-18.

Holmes A. (2020). Researcher positionality. A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research: A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8, 1–10.

Huberman A. M. & Miles M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. SAGE Publications.

Savin-Baden M. & Major C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-15

How to Cite

Candrakirana , T. (2025). Unveiling Perspectives: The Utility and Limitations of Qualitative Research Methods in Understanding Human Experiences and Behaviors. Educationist: Journal of Educational and Cultural Studies, 3(3), 210–216. Retrieved from https://jurnal.litnuspublisher.com/index.php/jecs/article/view/248